Classification: Social Sciences (Economics and Psychology) Title: Neuronal Substrates for Choice under Ambiguity, Risk, Gains, and Losses
نویسندگان
چکیده
Economic forces shape the behavior of individuals and institutions. Forces affecting individual behavior are attitudes about payoffs (gains and losses) and beliefs about outcomes (risk and ambiguity). Under risk, the likelihoods of alternative outcomes are fully known. Under ambiguity, these likelihoods are unknown. In our experiment, payoffs and outcomes were manipulated independently during a classical choice task as brain activity was measured with positron emission tomography (PET). Here, we show that attitudes about payoffs and beliefs about the likelihood of outcomes exhibit interaction effects both behaviorally and neurally. Participants are risk-averse in gains and risk-seeking in losses; they are ambiguity-averse in both gains and losses. Two neural substrates for choice surfaced in the interaction between attitudes and beliefs: a dorsomedial neocortical system and a ventromedial system.. This finding reveals that the brain does not honor a prevalent assumption of economics – the independence of the evaluations of payoffs and outcomes. The demonstration of a relationship between brain activity and observed economic choice attests to the feasibility of a neuroeconomic decision science.
منابع مشابه
Neuronal Substrates for Choice Under Ambiguity, Risk, Gains, and Losses
Kip Smith • John Dickhaut • Kevin McCabe • José V. Pardo Kansas State University, Department of Psychology, Manhattan, Kansas 66506 University of Minnesota, Carlson School of Management, Department of Accounting, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 George Mason University, Economics and Law, Krasnow Center, 4400 University Drive, MSN 5C7, Fairfax, Virginia 22030 Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cognit...
متن کاملLearning to make risk neutral choices in a symmetric world
Given their reference point, most people tend to be risk averse over gains and risk seeking over losses. Therefore, they exhibit a dual risk attitude which is reference dependent. This paper considers an adaptive process for choice under risk such that, in spite of a permanent short-run dual risk attitude, the agent eventually learns to make risk neutral choices. The adaptive process is based o...
متن کاملLoss Aversion, Framing, and Bargaining: The Implications of Prospect Theory for International Conflict
Prospect theory deviates from expected-utility theory by positing that how people frame a problem around a reference point has a critical influence on their choices and that people tend to overweight losses with respect to comparable gains, to be risk-averse with respect to gains and riskacceptant with respect to losses, and to respond to probabilities in a nonlinear manner. This study examines...
متن کاملRisk premiums and certainty equivalents of loss-averse newsvendors of bounded utility
Loss-averse behavior makes the newsvendors avoid the losses more than seeking the probable gains as the losses have more psychological impact on the newsvendor than the gains. In economics and decision theory, the classical newsvendor models treat losses and gains equally likely, by disregarding the expected utility when the newsvendor is loss-averse. Moreover, the use of unbounded utility to m...
متن کاملHidden actions and preferences for timing of resolution of uncertainty
We study preferences for timing of resolution of objective uncertainty in a simple menu-choice model with two stages of information arrival. We characterize a general class of utility representations called hidden action representations, which interpret an intrinsic preference for timing of resolution of uncertainty as if an unobservable action is taken between the resolution of the two periods...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2002